Some people said if funders applied to the people, many artists would be missed. But the current system does not work. Artists are being overlooked right now. The idea that a new model might also overlook people isn’t an argument against the need for change, it’s an argument for implementing change constantly. If we only introduce new systems or ideas once they solve every single problem perfectly, we will never introduce anything at all. We’ll just keep polishing the same br

What if funders applied to the people? es, funding keeps many arts projects alive. But the whole set up of arts funding in the UK also creates a weird obstacle course where artists are forced to compete for tiny pots of money. So all of this made me question why are artists doing all the work

Recently Rain Crew has been working with Sandblast Charity teaching dance to young Saharawi (Also commonly spelled Sahrawi) people who have grown up in exile, away from their homeland of Western Sahara

"How might we attract a more diverse audience to Rain Crew events?" Guided by Acumen and IDEO.org's nine week course on An Introduction...

How Moroccan B-boys taught me to never give up

A global quest to find the roots of Hiphop dance: A documentary series.

How to create a more inclusive arts industry

A culture of victim blaming

The Epidemic of youth centre closures and its consequences